🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," said a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," said a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to copy this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, other states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations take a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.